Greenwald v. Veurink
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
On December 2, 1966, defendant Veurink executed a standard form real estate listing agreement designating Sun Agency as exclusive broker for tbe sale of “Lot 2, Blk 1, Continental Addition, City of Muskegon”. The broker was to earn a commission of 10% of the purchase price if it procured “a Purchaser ready, willing, and able to purchase said property upon the terms and conditions set forth, or upon such other terms and conditions as the Owner shall accept in writing # * * ”. The “terms and conditions” were essentially “cash to seller”. On the second carbon of the agreement Mr. Greenwald wrote…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Calka v. DonahoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- WESTDALE COMPANY v. GietzenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Barber v. VernonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oshtemo Township v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977