Espinoza v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUTTS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary. Trial was to the court. Punishment was assessed at twelve years’ imprisonment, enhanced by a prior conviction.
In only one ground of error appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. With this contention of insufficiency we agree.
Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.02 (Vernon 1974) provides in part:(a) A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner, he:(1) enters a habitation, or a building (or any portion of a building) not then open to the public, with intent to commit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Hooker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Eanes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Espinoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982