Legal Opinion

Developers Small Business Investment Corporation v. Robert G. Hoeckle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1968No. 21849Published

1Opinion of the Court

395 F.2d 80

DEVELOPERS SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, a

corporation, Appellant,

v.

Robert G. HOECKLE, Blanche Bateman, Jean N. Bell, Surjit

Singh, H. Linn Hinkle, Louis Bonomi and Edmond V.

Bayer, Appellees.

No. 21849.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 13, 1968.

Kurt W. Melchior (argued), David Self, of Severson, Werson, Berke & Bull, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Robert A. Thompson (argued), of Gottesman & Thompson, San Francisco, Cal., James B. McKenney, of Pendergrass, McKenney, Perry & Ward, San Rafael, Cal., for appellees.

Before POPE, BROWNING and CARTER, Circuit…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Bonanno v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API