Legal Opinion

Reed v. Ocello

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 1993No. 63509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, an independent contractor, who had a contract to trim defendant-homeowners’ tree, was injured when a tree limb that his employee had trimmed fell and struck him. He sued homeowners for injuries sustained. His initial petition alleged liability in two counts, which were based on “the inherently dangerous activity” and the “failure to provide a safe work place” doctrines, respectively. An amended petition added a third count under the doctrine of “retained possession of land-negligence.” Homeowners answered and moved to dismiss all counts for failure to state a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Hofstetter v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Sullivan v. St. Louis Station AssociatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hatch v. V.P. Fair Foundation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. McMillan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Prenger v. BaumhoerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Southard v. Buccaneer Homes Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API