Luman v. Hill

Kimball, Justice.

The plaintiff in error has filed a petition for a re-hearing. Our former opinion is reported 252 Pac. 1019. The-petition for a rehearing suggests nothing that causes us to doubt the correctness of our decision. We held that the finding by the trial judge that the amended petition tu vacate did not state facts sufficient to warrant a vacation of the judgment was of itself a sufficient reason for the dismissal of that petition in the trial court. It is now argued, as, indeed, it was on the former hearing, that, when the motion to strike the amended petition was denied, the…