Legal Opinion

Kelley C. v. Kim M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly determined that these paternity proceedings are barred by res judicata. Petitioner contends that res judicata should not apply because the court in the prior paternity proceedings dismissed the petitions therein without considering the results of DNA testing, which indicated a high probability that respondent is the children’s father. The order dismissing the prior petitions was dated June 19, 1995, and Family Court Act § 532 (a) was amended effective June 15, 1994 to establish a rebuttable presumption of paternity in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slocum v. Joseph B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Hrouda v. WinneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WEAVER, ELSWORTH L. v. DURFEY, PAMELA L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Matter of Michael S. v. Sultana R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Ricks v. BrownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API