Legal Opinion

Mattingly v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1957No. 29,492PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged by affidavit with conspiring with his brother Wilson Mattingly and one William Ausley under Acts 1905, ch. 169, §641, p. 584, being §10-1101, Burns’ 1956 Replacement, to commit a felony, to-wit: “to break and enter into Reed’s Barbershop in Mount Vernon, Indiana, ... to take, steal and carry away the goods, chattels and personal property of Jesse Reed . . . .”

He was separately tried by the court, without the intervention of a jury, found guilty as charged and sentenced to the Indiana Reformatory.

Two questions are presented for our consideration.

First: Appellee asserts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Robertson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Landis Ex Rel. Talley v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Mattingly v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Garcia v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Shelton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Smith, Peak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API