Legal Opinion
In Re Panayotoff
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 20, 1992No. 19-50025PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DETERMINING APPLICABILITY OP AUTOMATIC STAY IN BANKRUPTCY
GREGORY F. KISHEL, Bankruptcy Judge.
This Chapter 12 case came on before the Court on May 4, 1992, for hearing on Debt- or’s motion, styled as one “for an order to show cause.” Upon the moving and responsive documents and the arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following order.
Debtor filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 12 on March 6, 1992. For a number of years before her bankruptcy filing, she and George Panayotoff, her husband, engaged in vegetable and crop farming on approximately 250 acres of land in Sher-burne…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joe DeLisi Fruit Co. v. Minnesota, Department of Agriculture (In Re Joe DeLisi Fruit Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Metro Mill & Casework, Inc. v. Fiedler (In Re Fiedler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Blarney, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul (In Re Blarney, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Estate of Nelson v. RobbinsMontana Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atkins v. Martinez (In Re Atkins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Galmore v. Dykstra (In Re Galmore)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Schieffler v. Pulaski Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Molitor)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995
- In Re StewardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Carver v. MoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.