Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Maturin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1975No. 4963Published

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

MILLER, Judge.

In his application, plaintiff contends the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 mandates that a five judge panel hear reargument because there was one dissent to the reversal of the trial court’s decision. We considered this issue before handing down our opinion and concluded that art. XIV, § 23 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, provides that the proceedings in this case are to be “unaffected” by other provisions of the constitution. This section states, insofar as is here applicable, that:

All writs, actions, suits, proceedings, civil or criminal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Naquin v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Smith v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Wright v. Sabine River AuthorityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. State, Department of Highways v. MimsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. STAPLE COTTON COOPERATIVE ASS'N v. PickettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API