Legal Opinion

Ferens v. Deere & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 28, 1987No. 86-3595PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before GIBBONS, Chief Judge, and SEITZ and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Chief Judge:

The present action is here on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Sun Oil Co. v. Wortman, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2117, 100 L.Ed.2d 743 (1988). In Ferens v. Deere & Co., 819 F.2d 423 (3d Cir.1987), vacated and remanded 486 U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2862, 101 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988), this court held that a Mississippi court could not apply Missis*32sippi’s statute of limitations to a tort which occurred in Pennsylvania where both…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Development Corp. v. BinsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  2. Kondrath v. ArumDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  3. Albert J. Ferens and Margaret L. Ferens, His Wife v. Deere & Company. Albert J. Ferens and Margaret L. Ferens, His Wife v. John Deere Company, A/K/A Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Wilcha v. First National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API