Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hallman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1929No. 27,326PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal by the administrator of the estate of defendant Hallman from an order refusing to vacate and set aside a default judgment against Hall-man.

The motion was based on G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9283, which provides for relief of a party from a judgment rendered against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The matter of opening such default lies almost wholly in the discretion of the trial court, and its action will not be reversed on appeal except for a clear abuse of discretion. There were conflicting affidavits, not only of opposing attorneys but of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ButlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. McMahon v. Pequot Rural Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API