Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1918No. 6139PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

This is a suit filed June 1, 1916, by'John S. Patterson, then commissioner of insurance and banking of the state of Texas, and who was the successor in office of H. W. Collier, against J. P. Sadler, Jr., R. E. Brooks, and J. M. Powers, to enforce the payment of an assessment of $14,-000, being the par value of 140 shares of the stock of the Pirst State Bank of Amarillo, Tex., originally issued to said Sadler, and within 12 months next before the suspension of payments by said bank transferred by him to said Powers, who, it was alleged, acquired and held same as the agent of said Brooks. It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. PettusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Heater v. LloydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Harris v. BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  4. Houston Nat. Exch. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Markus v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API