Parker v. Rinker Materials Corp.

By petition for writ of certiorari, Parker contends that an order of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, rendered September 30, 1968, (petition for rehearing denied October 17, 1968) dismissing his appeal for failure to pay costs, conflicts with the decisions of this Court in. Nolan v. Eshleman1 and Johanson v. Insua.2 We agree.

The question presented involves construction of Florida Appellate Rule 3.2, subd. f., 1967, 32 F.S.A.,3 which has since *204been substantially changed; therefore, no useful purpose will be served by rendering an extensive opinion. Parker instituted this action…