Brooks v. Wiesz
District Court, D. North Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
DANIEL L. HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Federal Sub ject Matter Jurisdiction filed on March 13, 2008. See Docket No. 11. On April 23, 2008, the Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition to the motion. See Docket No. 27. The Defendant filed a reply brief on April 29, 2008. See Docket No. 29. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs contend that prior to July 29, 2004, Helen Austin had designated specific certificates of deposit…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Tomas Menchaca and Wife, Irma Menchaca v. Chrysler Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Todd v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2019