Legal Opinion

Bacot v. Holloway

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1925No. 23441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Headnotes 1. Appeal and Error, 4 C.J., Section 3311; 2. Costs, 15 C.J., Sections 411, 424, 426; 3. Appeal and Error, 4 C.J., Section 3311; Costs, 15 C.J., Section 422. The complainant, W.C. Bacot, alleged in his bill: That he was the owner of, and had a perfect fee-simple title to one hundred sixty acres of land situated in Quitman county, Miss. He deraigned his title beginning with a patent from the United States government, sets out a perfect chain of title from the United States government through mesne conveyances to him; his immediate grantor being the Yazoo Mississippi Valley Railroad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bacot v. HollowayMississippi Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merrifield v. BucknerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hubbard v. Delta Sanitation of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  3. Inman v. Travelers' Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wilson v. City of LexingtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State Highway Commission v. MasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API