Legal Opinion

United States v. Estate of Bishop

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 7, 1901Published

Eminent Domain. Motion to Strike Out Certain Amended Answers.

1Opinion of the Court

Estee I.

On th© 6th day of July, 1901, this action was instituted by the filing of a. verified complaint on the part of the United States and the issuance of a summons directed -to all of the defendants named in idle said petition; thereafter, on tbe 26th day of July, 1901, tbe said summons wias returned and filed with return of service m'adei by the Deputy United States Marshal, upon the following named defendants to wit:

Estate of Bernice Panahi Bishop, deceased, Oahu Pailway and Land Company, Limited, The Dows'ett Company, Limited, Honolulu Sugar Company, Honolulu Plantation Company, John,'…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Shepard v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. O'Hare v. Chicago, Madison & Northern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API