Smith v. Smith
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
No abuse of discretion has been demonstrated in the trial court’s award of $75,000 in attorney’s fees for the representation of the wife in the cause we considered in Smith v. Smith, 378 So.2d 11 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1118 (Fla.1980). Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Posner v. Posner, 315 So.2d 175 (Fla.1975); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 400 So.2d 32 (Fla.3d DCA 1981); Adams v. Adams, 376 So.2d 1204 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1980); Snider v. Snider, 375 So.2d 591 (Fla.3d DCA 1979), appeal dismissed, 385 So.2d 760 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Adams v. AdamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Snider v. SniderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Posner v. PosnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.