Minno v. Pro-Fab, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil applies to a situation in which two corporations are owned by common individual shareholders but neither corporation owns an interest in the other corporation. Because this situation does not involve the owner of a corporation misusing his control over that corporation, we conclude that the doctrine does not apply. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is reversed.
I
{¶ 2} This case began in 2004 when James Minno, his wife, his stepdaughter, and his son, plaintiffs-appellees, filed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- Dombroski v. WellPoint, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MovielOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Minno v. Pro-FabOhio Supreme Court · 2008
3Cited by45 opinions
- Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Champion Foodservice, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- In re Appalachian Fuels, LLCBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. MMCO, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.