Legal Opinion

Minno v. Pro-Fab, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2009No. 2008-0170PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.

{¶ 1} The issue to be determined in this appeal is whether the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil applies to a situation in which two corporations are owned by common individual shareholders but neither corporation owns an interest in the other corporation. Because this situation does not involve the owner of a corporation misusing his control over that corporation, we conclude that the doctrine does not apply. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is reversed.

I

{¶ 2} This case began in 2004 when James Minno, his wife, his stepdaughter, and his son, plaintiffs-appellees, filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. R.E. Roark Companies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dombroski v. WellPoint, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MovielOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Minno v. Pro-FabOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Champion Foodservice, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  4. In re Appalachian Fuels, LLCBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  5. U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. MMCO, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API