Legal Opinion · Dissent

Westbrook v. Mente Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1926Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The testimony on the part of appellant was to the effect that no one of the shipments of bags came up to the specifications of the original contract, and this fact was called to the attention of the salesman of appellee, who in each instance agreed to have the defects remedied. Other orders were placed, and the same defects were found. Finally, after repeated protests against the character of bags which were shipped under the contract and the unperformed promises to comply with the contract, appellant discontinued his orders. A salesman of appellee called to see appellant, and the subject was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wooten & Co. v. Bain-Adams Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API