Legal Opinion · Dissent

California-Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 5, 1934No. 6874Published

1DissentWilbur, Circuit Judge

I concur in that portion of the main opinion which construes the Desert Land Act of March 3, 1877 (19 Stat. 377 [43 USCA § 321]).

The main opinion relies largely on the Hood River Case, 114 Or. 112, 227 P. 1065, adjudicating the rights of claimants to water in the Hood river of Oregon. This ease dealt with the power rights of the Pacific Power & Light Company. The court held that the Pacific Power & Light Company, although the owner of riparian land on both banks of the Hood river, was not entitled to the undiminished flow of the river through their land under the law of Oregon, and that the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  5. Railroad Co. v. SchurmeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API