Legal Opinion

Lyman v. Bowe

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided March 15, 1884Published

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

— The chattel mortgages were conditioned for the payment of certain moneys on demand. No demand had been made on the mortgagors,, and the respondent levied upon the property while in their- possession. The interest of mortgagors having a right to redeem, and a right to the possession of the mortgaged property for a definite period, has been many times adjudicated to-be subject to levy and sale on execution (Mattison agt. Baucus, 1 N. Y. R., 295; Hall agt. Simpson, 19 How. Pr., 481; Farrell agt. Hildreth, 38 Barb., 178).

The question presented'by this appeal is whether or not the admitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farrell v. HildrethNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Hall v. SamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Wagner v. JonesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API