Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Wirtz v. Sheehan

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 29, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 70-C-241Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, District Judge.

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus brought against the Army. Petitioner contends that his application for a conscientious objector discharge was improperly denied. The petitioner is a reserve member of the United States Army who was ordered to active duty. A temporary restraining order to prevent processing was issued and this court held that it had jurisdiction over this controversy. United States ex rel. Wirtz v. Sheehan, 319 F.Supp. 146 (E.D.Wis.1970). I hold now that the writ should issue.

The parties have stipulated to the facts. For…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States ex rel. Conrad v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  4. United States ex rel. Wirtz v. SheehanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API