Legal Opinion

Getty v. Hudson River Rail Road

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a motion to set aside an amended complaint. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, Justice.

The defendant seeks to set aside the amended complaint on the ground that it is for a cause of action different from that set forth in the original complaint, and therefore irregular.

The original complaint alleged the construction of a rail road, across a bay between plaintiff’s farm and the Hudson River, and claimed damages for thus obstructing the navigation between the farm and the river. The amended complaint not only claims such damages for the injury already suffered by such obstruction, but also seeks indemnity for the future, by praying that the defendants be adjudged…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoner v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wakeman v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API