Center Point Gin v. Hathcock
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Carrollton — Judge Hood, August 5, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. The judge did not err in not giving to the jury such instructions as are set out in special grounds 1 and 2 of the motion for a new trial.
2. Grounds 3 and 4 of the- amendment to the motion for a new trial can not be considered by this court, because: (a) Each ground complains of the admission of specified testimony of a witness, but fails to state the name of the witness. Powell v. State, 25 Ga. App. 329 (2) (103 S. E. 174); Hunter v. State, 148 Ga. 566 (1) (148 S. E. 566). (6) “ Under repeated decisions of this court and of the Supreme Court, each special ground of a motion for a new…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Pound v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Smith v. CastoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Stephens v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cason v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Royal v. Montfort & RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Center Point Gin v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922