Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1985No. 2800PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Prudential) commenced an action for declaratory judgment to determine the validity of an arbitration award entered against it and in favor of Myrtle McDaniel. The trial court, in response to preliminary objections filed by McDaniel, concluded that Prudential was attempting to attack the arbitration award collaterally and dismissed the action. We affirm.

Myrtle McDaniel had been a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by Doll Wilson when it was involved in a collision with an uninsured motorist on February 16, 1980. The Wilson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. North Canton Enterprises of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Township of RossCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. U.S. Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lucas-Raso v. American Manufacturers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Buehl v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Jewelcor Inc. v. Pre-Fab Panelwall, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API