A. Harris & Co. v. Lucas
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Circuit Judge.
In this case there is no dispute as to the material facts. It appears that petitioner is a Texas corporation operating a department store in Dallas, Tex., selling at retail dry goods, dresses, shoes, and other articles usually handled by a retail store of that class. In 1916, in order to avoid bankruptcy, it eiféeted a compromise with its creditors, other than the banks, whereby 50 cents on the dollar was accepted by them in full settlement of claims aggregating over $130,000. In making its returns for 1916, petitioner accounted for the balance of the obligations…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
3Cited by34 opinions
- Briarcliff Candy Corporation, (Formerly Loft Candy Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Catlettsburg, KY. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Blackmer v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Max Lutz and Ruth Lutz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Helvering v. Community Bond & Mortgage CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.