Legal Opinion
Bay Area Properties, Inc. v. Dutch Housing, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 13, 2004No. 03-C-154Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Bay Area Properties, a dealer in manufactured homes, brought suit against Dutch Housing, a home manufacturer, under Wisconsin’s Fair Dealership Law, Wis. Stat. § 135.01 et seq., (the “WFDL”). Bay Area alleges that Dutch illegally effected a “substantial change [in] the competitive circumstances” of their oral dealership agreement when Dutch failed to offer Bay Area an incentive program that it offered to other dealers. Wis. Stat. § 135.03. The plaintiff also alleges that Dutch illegally terminated its dealership without notice or good cause. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Lynn Moodie, Cross-Appellee v. School Book Fairs, Inc., a Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Frieburg Farm Equipment, Inc. v. Van Dale, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Richard E. Moore v. Tandy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.