Longstreth v. Gensel
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
423 Mich. 675 (1985)
377 N.W.2d 804
LONGSTRETH
v.
GENSEL
Docket Nos. 71465, 71503. (Calendar No. 4).
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Argued April 3, 1984.
Decided November 27, 1985.
LeFevre, Swartz & Wilson (by Martin B. Wilson) for the plaintiffs.
Collison, Chasnis & Dogger, P.C. (by Jeffrey C. Collison), for defendants Gensel.
O'Neill, Ackerman, Wallace, Doyle & Jones, P.C. (by Terence J. O'Neill and Timothy L. Tacket), for defendants Langston.
CAVANAGH, J.
The issue presented is whether plaintiffs can maintain a cause of action based on violation of MCL 436.33; MSA 18.1004, which prohibits a person from…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.