Legal Opinion

Longstreth v. Gensel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1985No. Docket Nos. 71465, 71503. (Calendar No. 4)Published

1Opinion of the Court

423 Mich. 675 (1985)

377 N.W.2d 804

LONGSTRETH

v.

GENSEL

Docket Nos. 71465, 71503. (Calendar No. 4).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued April 3, 1984.

Decided November 27, 1985.

LeFevre, Swartz & Wilson (by Martin B. Wilson) for the plaintiffs.

Collison, Chasnis & Dogger, P.C. (by Jeffrey C. Collison), for defendants Gensel.

O'Neill, Ackerman, Wallace, Doyle & Jones, P.C. (by Terence J. O'Neill and Timothy L. Tacket), for defendants Langston.

CAVANAGH, J.

The issue presented is whether plaintiffs can maintain a cause of action based on violation of MCL 436.33; MSA 18.1004, which prohibits a person from…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Rappaport v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Congini by Congini v. PORTERSVILLE ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API