Legal Opinion

In re Richards

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 11, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harry G. Herman, S.

In connection with this petition pursuant to section 194 of the Surrogate’s Court Act for the withdrawal of funds from the estate of this infant for his support and education, the application, insofar as it seeks payment for debts of the infant’s deceased father, is denied (cf. Matter of Brodine, 10 A D 2d 414, affd. 13 N Y 2d 734; Matter of Rowan, 11 Misc 2d 759).

As Surrogate McGrath stated in Matter of Rowan (supra, pp. 760-761): “A careful reading of section 194 of the Surrogate’s Court Act discloses that the underlying principle of this section points to the fact that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of NevilleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of ConnollyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  3. In re RowanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of KesslerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chrzan v. RuaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API