Legal Opinion

Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Special Term properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $166,152.03. It is uncontested that defendants owed plaintiff that sum. Furthermore, the asserted defenses of novation, accord and satisfaction, and equitable estoppel are without merit (see, Fuller v Kemp, 138 NY 231; Donemore Clothing Co. v Shapiro, 202 NYS 258; Cantasano v Courtney, 98 Misc 623; McLaughlin v Gillings, 18 Misc 56). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. McLaughlin v. GillingsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. Cantasano v. CourtneyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917