Legal Opinion

Haines v. Keahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1899Published

Appeal from trial term, New York county. Action by John Haines against Patrick H. Keahon. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The plaintiff was injured by a horse belonging to the defendant. It appeared from the evidence: That the plaintiff was a vender of vegetables, and on the morning of June 26, 1897, went to Gansevoort Market to make purchases. That, while standing on the street engaged in loading his cart, two horses belonging to the defendant came along Gansevoort street, going towards ■Greenwich street, the one on the north side being ridden by an employé of the defendant, and the other being led by a strap or halter. That, as the horses came along close to where the'plaintiff was •standing, the led horse…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickson v. . McCoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Benoit v. . Troy Lansingburgh R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Cadwell v. . ArnheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. United Glass Co. v. . VaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Crozier v. ReadNew York Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API