McCullough v. Certain Teed Products Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order of Special Term which denied its motion under CPLR 3211 to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. We find that the allegations of the complaint are sufficient to state the two causes of action alleged therein. The first cause of action, in the nature of an intentional tort, alleges, inter alia, that plaintiff was discharged from his employment because of his refusal to participate with other employees of defendant, including his superiors, in allegedly unlawful conduct. While we do not read the complaint as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Morrison v. National Broadcasting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Wegman v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- November v. Time Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gail Davis v. Diana RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Privitera v. Town of PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Sadowy v. Sony Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Valdan Sportswear v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Sherman v. St. Barnabas HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.