Legal Opinion

Erazo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 17, 2005No. 14-01-01195-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

This is a murder case. A previous panel of this court considered whether the trial court erred in admitting an autopsy photograph of a dead fetus removed from the deceased complainant and found no error. The Court of Criminal Appeals disagreed and remanded the case to this court for a harm analysis. After reviewing the entire record on remand, we do not have fair assurance that this photograph did not influence the jury or that it influenced the jury only slightly in assessing appellant’s punishment. Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erazo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  5. Godwin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Biondi Vernard Rolle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Alex Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Biondi Vernard Rolle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. Biondi Vernard Rolle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API