Knowles v. United States
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAmundson, Justice
(concurring specially)-
[¶ 54] I concur that the 1986 cap is unconstitutional and the most solid ground for such a holding is that it violates due process. There is no rational, logical, or commonsense reason for establishing the arbitrary classification of medical malpractice victims into those who receive 100% of their recovery because their damages are one million dollars or less, whereas the more seriously injured who incur damages in excess of one million will receive only a percentage of their damage award. The legislative history for the 1986 enactment is totally inadequate to support a…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.