Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Knowles v. United States

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1996No. 18838Published

1ConcurrenceAmundson, Justice

(concurring specially)-

[¶ 54] I concur that the 1986 cap is unconstitutional and the most solid ground for such a holding is that it violates due process. There is no rational, logical, or commonsense reason for establishing the arbitrary classification of medical malpractice victims into those who receive 100% of their recovery because their damages are one million dollars or less, whereas the more seriously injured who incur damages in excess of one million will receive only a percentage of their damage award. The legislative history for the 1986 enactment is totally inadequate to support a…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API