Legal Opinion

Kirkpatrick v. Corning

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1883Published

Bill for relief. On general demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

This bill is filed by the present receiver of the late firm of James Horner & Co. against Erastus Corning, James Ludlum and Susan H., his wife, Alice Buckingham, as executrix and devisee under the will of James Horner, deceased, and John M. Buckingham, her husband, Susan Horner and the Pompton Steel and Iron Company. It states that the firm of James Horner & Co. was composed of James Horner and James Ludlum, and carried on the business of manufacturing steel and files at Pompton, in the county of Passaic, in this state; that it was dissolved in 1874'by the death of Horner; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. WilsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API