Stoker v. Stoker
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Before us is a judgment of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff’s action is for personal injuries alleged to have been intentionally inflicted, and to have been suffered at the hands of defendant, prior to the divorce of the parties.
The only issue presented is whether the doctrine of Interspousal Tort Immunity prevents the trial of this action. We hold, that it does not. The judgment is reversed, and the matter remanded for trial. Costs to appellant. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated 1953, unless otherwise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rubalcava v. GissemanUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Taylor v. PattenUtah Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by35 opinions
- Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Heino v. HarperOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Price v. PriceTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Bozman v. BozmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Burns v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.