Legal Opinion

Cesar v. United Technology

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Greenfield, J.

When this action was previously dismissed under CPLR 327 upon the urging of the defendants that New York was an inconvenient forum, the courts were obviously persuaded there was a better alternative forum in which the suit could be brought. (Varkonyi v S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio Grandense [Varig], 22 NY2d 333, 338; Bader & Bader v Ford, 66 AD2d 642, 645.) If there were no better alternative forum *920available, New York courts would retain jurisdiction even though the nexus with the State is slight. (Aboujdid v Gulf Aviation Co., 108 Misc 2d 175,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. HigginbothamSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Hart v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Varkonyi v. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio GrandenseNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cesar v. United TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API