Legal Opinion

In Re Capitol Hill Group

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 24, 2005No. 02-00359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ADDRESSING PRAECIPE RE ASSERTED ISSUANCE OF MANDATE

S. MARTIN TEEL, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

Shaw Pittman 1 filed a praecipe on August 22, 2005, presenting certified copies of the District Court’s Orders and its Memorandum Opinions filed on June 22, 2005. 2 Shaw Pittman contends that these certified copies constitute an issuance of a mandate by the district court, such that, under Lindner & Assocs., P.C. v. Richards (In re Richards), 241 B.R. 769, 770 (Bankr.D.D.C.1999), this court may now direct enforcement of its monetary judgment of December 1, 2004, which was affirmed by one of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

David A. Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
Bell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
United States v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
Finberg v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
United States v. Wilson Robertson, Jr., A/K/A James CollinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lofstedt v. Kendall (In re Kendall)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014