Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 14,502; No. 15,143; No. 15,431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to retax costs.

1Opinion of the Court

*699The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

In each of these cases the plaintiff in error obtained a decision in its favor, upon which a judgment was at once entered in its behalf for the costs in this court. (Railway Co. v. Jenkins, 74 Kan. 487; Railway Co. v. McDowell, 78 Kan. 686; Railway Co. v. Hutchings, 78 Kan. 758.) In each case the defendant in error paid the costs as taxed, and the plaintiff in error now moves to retax the costs by adding, charges, which it had not previously claimed, for the expenses of preparing the case-made and printing the abstract of the record. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Hutchings, Sealy & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Flisher v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owens v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. McAfee v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API