Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agricultural & Industrial Corp. v. Chemical Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 19, 1983Published

1DissentSilverman, J.

I would grant the protective order striking all the document requests complained of except the corporate minutes of Fertitex, if appellant has them, and the report referred to in Item No. 11. The remaining requests are invalid for lack of specificity. CPLR 3120 (subd [a], par 1, cl [i]) requires that documents sought by discovery be “specified with reasonable particularity”. In Harnett v Skandia Amer. Reinsurance Corp. (60 AD2d 515), this court said: “The items [set forth in the notice] are typically in the form of ‘all documents and other materials including but not limited to, * * *…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Columbia RecordsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Harnett v. Skandia America Reinsurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API