Legal Opinion

State v. Julian, Wm-06-009 (7-13-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 2007No. WM-06-009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶ 1} Appellant, Jack B. Julian, appeals his conviction for assault entered by the Williams County Court of Common Pleas in the above-captioned case on the grounds that: (1) his waiver of counsel was inadequate; (2) the trial court improperly permitted "hybrid representation"; and (3) appellant's trial counsel was ineffective. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} On November 16, 2005, appellant was indicted on a single charge of assault, in violation of R.C. 2903.13 (A)(C)(3). On November 17, appellant made his initial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Smith, Unpublished Decision (1-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NavarroOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API