Legal Opinion

McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1935No. Sac. No. 4711PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action is referred to in the opinion this day filed in the ease of McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp. (Sac. No. 4765), ante, p. 704 [45 Pac. (2d) 807], and is a companion case to the Anna McArthur case. Respondent’s lands front on Pittville Pool and are located on the same side of said pool as the Anna McArthur lands, and between the two parcels of Anna McArthur lands involved in her said action against the appellant herein. The same factual situation exists in this case as was presented in the Anna McArthur case. For this reason the decision in this case must be the same as that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API