Legal Opinion

Stansel v. Rountree

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Madison County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Carter, J.:

On September 25, 1893, defendants in error interposed a claim to certain personal property levied on by the sheriff of Madison county under a writ of attachment in favor of plaintiff in error, against David Brown, June Brown, Daniel Brown and Handy Brown, by making affidavit that said property belonged to them, and giving bond payable to plaintiff in error, conditioned as required by our statutes. The writ of attachment does not appear in the record, nor does the record show when it issued, nor the date of the levy. The claim proceeding was tried October 12, 1894, in the Circuit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Price v. SanchezSupreme Court of Florida · 1858
  3. Allen v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Kirschenschlager v. Armitage Herschel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. F. O. Sawyer Paper Co. v. ManganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. H. B. Claflin Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. County of Sarasota, Florida, & United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Barney Cavanaugh Hardware Co. v. Lewis & Bro.Supreme Court of Florida · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API