Bloodgood v. State of Florida

The plaintiff in error was convicted under the third count of an information charging him with the crime of being accessory before the fact of the larceny of a Ford automobile. The only assignment of error is that the court erred in failing to grant motion for a new trial. One of the grounds of the motion for new trial was that there was no evidence to support the verdict rendered by the jury.

It is well settled that where there is substantial.evidence to support the verdict of the jury and there is no showing that the verdict of the jury was influenced by anything outside the evidence, this…