Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Reeves & McNeil

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 29, 1899PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Smytli county, rendered December 15, 1898, in an action of trespass on the case, wherein the defendants in error were the plaintiffs, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

Defendants in error, trading' as Eeeves & McNeil, brought their action in the Circuit Court of Smyth county against the Norfolk and Western Eailway Company upon five several and separate contracts, or bills of lading, for the carriage of live stock from Marion, Va. Eive of the car loads of stock were consigned to the shippers themselves. There were two car loads of sheep and one of cattle billed for Philadelphia, Pa.; one of cattle billed for Lancaster, Pa.; and another of sheep for Norfolk, *286Ya. The sheep and cattle so shipped were loaded on the cars at Marion, late in the evening of December…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond & Alleghany Railroad v. R. A. Patterson Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Hess v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wadley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Walls v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  3. Farish & Co. v. ReigleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  4. American Bonding Co. v. Regents of UniversityIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API