Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Utah Board of Pardons

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00753Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION DANIEL ORTIZ, ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION DISMISSING HABEAS Petitioner, PETITION v. Case No. 2:23-cv-753-TC UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS, et al., Judge Tena Campbell Respondents. Petitioner Daniel Ortiz, appearing pro se, filed a petition for habeas corpus relief (the AEDPA Petition) under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). See

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“[A] district court shall entertain an application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Davila v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Thomas v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API