Legal Opinion

United States v. Marrin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1909No. Nos. 44, 45, and 46PublishedCited by 14 opinions

On Petition to Stay Forfeiture of Recognizance.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, District Judge.

Frank C. Marrin presents his petition to this court praying that he be not held in default by reason of his nonappearance in person in court, and that his recognizance be not forfeited. On May 18, 1908, Marrin took an appeal from a sentence imposed upon him in this court to the appellate court of the Third circuit, and entered into a recognizance, with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as surety, in the sum of $10,000, the-condition of which is as follows:

“That if the said Frank O. Marrin, alias Frank O. Stone, alias Franklin Stone, alias Thomas Harper,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. United States v. Van FossenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1871
  3. The Erskine M. PhelpsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1904
  4. State Trust Co. of New York v. City of DuluthU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morse v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. MarrinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Allison v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. BroomOregon Supreme Court · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API