Legal Opinion

Florida Eye Clinic, P.A. v. Gmach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 2009No. 5D09-64PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, W., Senior Judge.

The petitioner, Florida Eye Clinic, P.A. (FEC), seeks certiorari review of a discovery order obtained by the plaintiff, Mary T. Gmach, in a medical malpractice action on the basis that said order will cause it irreparable harm that cannot be corrected by post-trial appeal. At issue are incident reports concerning complaints of infections and related investigations at the FEC facility over a four-year period from 2002 to 2006.

This petition implicates the work-product doctrine, attorney-client privilege, and the breadth and burden of the requested discovery. Our decision…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings. Frank J. Duffy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. The Duplan Corporation v. Moulinage Et Retorderie De Chavanoz, Deering Milliken, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amber Edwards v. Larry D. Thomas, M.D.Supreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Acevedo v. Doctors Hospital, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Bartow HMA, LLC v. KirklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Bartow HMA, LLC v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. LOWER KEYS MEDICAL CENTER v. WindischDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API