Legal Opinion

Formor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 21, 1996No. 94-2883PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

676 So.2d 1013 (1996)

Curtis FORMOR, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-2883.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 21, 1996.

Robert J. Nesmith, Orlando, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Curtis Formor was convicted of six counts of kidnapping with intent to commit a felony and six counts of home invasion robbery while wearing a mask. He appeals his convictions and argues two errors on appeal. His first argument is that the state's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Faison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  5. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Biggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Kent v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Elozar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API