Legal Opinion

People v. Hinchey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: While it was error to permit testimony of uncharged crimes, reversal is not warranted. The criminal activity testified to was not related to the crime charged and the improper testimony was limited to a single, isolated statement by the witness *749(see People v Kelly, 38 AD2d 1004). In view of the overwhelming proof of defendant’s guilt, there is no significant probability that, but for the error, the jury would have acquitted (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 242, 243). We have examined the other contentions raised by defendant and find them to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API